<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>maximise</title><description></description><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>35</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-9026441580869335978</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-01T00:49:04.345+01:00</atom:updated><title>Going into space - What you can do If you really put your mind to it.</title><atom:summary type='text'>Today I went to a rocket testfiring of what will probably be the first Danish launch of a human being into space. You could hear the roar of the rocket for miles as it went off strapped to a huge concrete block. That's  pretty big. The bigger thing is that it's all done by a private venture. And the really amazing thing is that it's done by two ordinary guys who just decided that this is what </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2010/02/going-into-space-what-you-can-do-if-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-8643699561558694004</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-10T16:02:29.064+02:00</atom:updated><title>Dreamers and doers</title><atom:summary type='text'>I know a lot of people that have started their own company, and I have even more anecdotes from forums and other sites on the web. I've noticed that there are two types of entrepreneurs. The dreamers and the doers.Kevin Rose showing the dreamers how to run a companyThe dreamers often have a romantic view of what it means to be an entrepreneur. They've seen Kevin Rose of Digg fame, they've seen </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/08/dreamers-and-doers.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-5689483324374826810</guid><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-23T01:39:45.142+02:00</atom:updated><title>Economists don't know what they're talking about.</title><atom:summary type='text'>Classical macroeconomic models are in trouble. They have difficulty predicting even the most basic things. As is apparent to anyone who bothers to go back and check the predictions and forecasts that are made by economists they are mostly just random numbers. Not because of bad faith, but because of bad models.In the current economic crisis one major school of economists,  the Keynesians, propose</atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/07/economists-dont-know-what-theyre.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-179973777682374729</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-16T13:31:24.328+02:00</atom:updated><title>A case for online office apps</title><atom:summary type='text'>A friend just sent me his thesis on Business angel networks in Denmark as a word document. I promised to read it through and comment on it before he turns it in some time next week. I've spent the last two hours trying to open the damn thing.The core of the problem is apparently that the document is created in word 2008 and my version of word is 2003. So I get an error message, and a prompt with </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/07/case-fo-online-office-apps.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>4</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-5701130939985301318</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-08T15:43:11.803+02:00</atom:updated><title>Why Google is making an operating system</title><atom:summary type='text'>Today Google announced that they are launching an operating system called Chrome OS. This is a strategically very smart move.Google makes money off the web, their primary source of revenue is adsense which brings in billions of dollars a year. They are quickly diversifying their offerings with google apps, gmail, analytics and a host of other applications. All of them webbased. They are an </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/07/why-google-is-making-operating-system.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>19</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-1698790821017995526</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-11T02:00:05.110+02:00</atom:updated><title>Worst case scenario</title><atom:summary type='text'>When you start a company it's common to write out a best, expected and worst case scenario analysis to see how many yachts you'll be able to buy if all goes well. And how bad it'll be if nothing goes according to plan.  The worst case analysis is often just the best case with little or no sales. "The worst that could ever happen is that we create a product, and not a lot of people will buy it" </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/06/worst-case-scenario.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-7638995285375284997</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-27T00:48:15.024+02:00</atom:updated><title>Moving a boat</title><atom:summary type='text'>This is a story about what it takes to start a company. It may not seem like it, but it is. I live on a boat in a harbour. It's an amazing place with just the right mix of artists, yacht owners and fishermen. As in all small communities there's a strong invisible pecking order. The fishermen are on top. They are the real men. They have survived force gale 12 storms in the bay of Biscay, they haul</atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/04/moving-boat.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-8705950149968039549</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-16T00:14:51.065+02:00</atom:updated><title>Getting product pricing right</title><atom:summary type='text'>Setting the right price for a product has always been one of the most difficult hurdles for startups. Of course it only makes it worse that the pricing of your product is one of the most important decisions you as a businessowner will ever make. So how do you do it?If your product happens to be webbased, here's an interesting idea. But first some basic economy on what the right price is.According</atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/01/getting-product-pricing-right.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-7087201309599763936</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-26T23:44:16.655+01:00</atom:updated><title>Let the engineers rule</title><atom:summary type='text'>For the last decade the people that have had success have primarily been bankers, brokers and othe money-pushers. I think the current crisis will mark a big shift in where money and power is centered. It will pass from financial engineers to real engineers.  Barack Obama has on The tonight show pinned the zeitgeist with this quote "What we need is young people instead of them wanting to be an </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/03/financial-engineers-are-out-real.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>9</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-3083281857592295843</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-10T00:46:04.993+01:00</atom:updated><title>Online news and the prisoners dilemma</title><atom:summary type='text'>Would you pay for a newssite on the Internet? If you won't you're in the vast majority.But what if we rephrase the question. Would you pay for a newssite on the Internet if there was no other free alternative? The answer would probably be yes, since there would be nowhere else for you to get that constantly updated dose of news that you're probably addicted to. So for a consumer a newssite is </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/03/online-news-and-prisoners-dilemma.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-8067157985730055148</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-12T23:01:27.695+01:00</atom:updated><title>Getting lucky is hard work</title><atom:summary type='text'>I have a friend that's always incredibly lucky. Everything she wants just seems to fall into her lap. When she moved to Copenhagen a few years ago she found an apartment in less than a week. Not just any apartment either, but one that was cheap and located in one of the best Copenhagen neighborhoods. And it's notoriously hard to get an apartment here, let alone a cheap one. When I asked her how </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/02/getting-lucky-is-hard-work.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-2760214840370439677</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-18T21:26:53.108+01:00</atom:updated><title>Why you should fail early and fail often</title><atom:summary type='text'>You hear the "fail early and fail often" mantra quite a bit. The basic idea is to find out as early as possible whether the project you're working on is going to be a success, and if it isn't let it fail. This is a hard thing to do: You have to accept the project as a failure, and implicitly accept that for whatever reason you didn't have what it took to suceed. There may, of course, be external </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/01/why-you-should-fail-early-and-fail.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>4</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-223430483858374185</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-08T19:11:44.841+01:00</atom:updated><title>Business plans for hackers</title><atom:summary type='text'>I've noticed that a lot of hackers and other technically capable people have problems understanding the reason for the existence of a business plan. And often fail to realise how hard a task it is to compose a good one.This post is an attempt to explain business plans in terms of programming languages.A business plan is just like a program, it's just written in the strange and difficult </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2009/01/business-plans-for-hackers.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-5501917830817453026</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-23T21:26:40.253+01:00</atom:updated><title>The entropy of code</title><atom:summary type='text'>Physics deals with an interesting concept called entropy that measures the state of disorder in a closed system. The second law of thermodynamics looselly states that over time a closed system will become more disorderly and chaotic if nothing is done to prevent it. If you haven't been to your basement for a while you can go down there and see for yourself that this is true: Things have become </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2008/12/entropy-of-code.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max Tobiasen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-6292833544401882322</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-11-26T15:11:18.011+01:00</atom:updated><title>Why the singularity may never arrive</title><atom:summary type='text'>Ray Kurzweil has been advocating for the past years that we are nearing a technological singularity. He has tracked technological progress from the slide rule and up to the present day and has found that technology moves forward at an ever faster pace, and that this pace is surprisinglys constant. The slide rule could do very few calculations at a very high price. Vacuum tubes were a lot better </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2008/11/why-singularity-may-never-arrive.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>11</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-7473222425655227428</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-11-10T21:30:55.957+01:00</atom:updated><title>Sovereign and transient applications - why SAAS  will win</title><atom:summary type='text'>Everything  on the web seems to be about AJAX and software as a service (SAAS) these days  - but is it just another fad, or will it change the way we work? I think the latter, and I will explain why.In 1996 Alan Cooper wrote "your programs posture", where he split the programs we use in our daily lives in four distinct categories - Sovereign, transient, daemonic and parasitic. Sovereign programs </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2007/01/moving-applications-to-web.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-4953475524001668613</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-01-11T14:38:26.087+01:00</atom:updated><title>Engineers of the West, engineers of the East</title><atom:summary type='text'>Outsourcing is all the rage these days, everything but my pizza delivery seems to be outsourced to India, China or some other far off place that takes away jobs. Years ago the western nations calmed themselves by agreeing that only low-tech production, assembly of paperclips and realdolls, would be outsourced - that complicated products needed our expertise. Then came callcenters. Then came </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2007/01/engineers-of-west-engineers-of-east.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>9</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-112612669483872774</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-09-13T16:23:23.966+02:00</atom:updated><title>Format wars</title><atom:summary type='text'>Here we go again, giants in the consumer electronics world are flexing their muscle, trying to promote, partner, steal or buy their way to dominance of the DVD format of the future. We have seen it before with betamax and VHS, but will we see it again ?.In one ringcorner is a powerful consortium consisting of Sony, Apple, Samsung, 20'th Century Fox, and a host of other players trying to promote </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/09/format-wars.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-111464120493896546</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-04-28T00:33:24.940+02:00</atom:updated><title>Why the bubble burst</title><atom:summary type='text'>I remember the heyday of the Internet bubble back in the late 90's. Champagne, million dollar business plans and irrational exuberance everywhere you looked. Those were the days. But why did the bubble burst ? Were we really that ignorant ? Did the emperor have no clothes on ?I think that many of the ideas, businesses and paradigms conceived during the bubble made good sense. ( Of course, I have </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/04/why-bubble-burst.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-111463797508393328</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-09-08T00:06:53.053+02:00</atom:updated><title>Probabilistic classification</title><atom:summary type='text'>Most of us are overwhelmed by information in our professional lives, and we are hard pressed to organise it in a consistent and coherent manner. This is a profound change from 10 years ago, yet we still cling to a hierarchical classification of data. We desperately roam our computers, trying to organise the overflow of information coming at us from all angles into neat folders. But for most of us</atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/04/probabilistic-classification.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-111054367213511428</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-04-07T15:49:46.700+02:00</atom:updated><title>Why Danish programmers are the best in the world</title><atom:summary type='text'>A friend of mine was trying to sell one of his companies a few years ago. The company in question collected sportsinformation from various sources, condensed and filtered it, and offered it as an SMS based service to media outlets, so that these could offer their customers up to date sporting information and not have to handle all the technicalities themselves. The company did quite well, and </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/04/why-danish-programmers-are-best-in.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-111049751201296012</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-03-11T00:33:00.850+01:00</atom:updated><title>High-end Vs. Low-end</title><atom:summary type='text'>Take a look at a market over time. Any market. Now look at who has the bigger marketshare: The players in the high-end or low-end of the market. In the beginning it will typically be the high-end market that dominates the market. Primarily because the market is new, the technology is hard, the idea is novel, or simply because customers are willing to pay a high price for a new commodity. </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/03/high-end-vs-low-end.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-111049246212785677</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-03-11T00:36:06.263+01:00</atom:updated><title>Good marketing practises</title><atom:summary type='text'>I find it interesting that Google has become a global brand in less than 6 years (see earlier post) and that they have done so without much marketing, if any at all. How do they do it ? Well of course they are the best of breed in their category, delivering a service that outpaces all the competitors. But then again, BetaMax was a better technology than VHS so technical superiority doesn't seem </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/03/good-marketing-practises.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-110989817242357114</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-03-21T10:48:38.440+01:00</atom:updated><title>Copycat</title><atom:summary type='text'>I just saw that Intel shows off a Mac mini knock-off and tries to get on the heels of Apple in the market for designer computers. No doubt that there is a huge market for designer PC's, hell I wouldn't mind paying a 30% premium if I could get a PC that was as cool as a Mac mini. But it seems to me that Intel has missed the point of a designer computer. If you want to get a share of the market it </atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/03/copycat.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7758596.post-110766892565044753</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2005-03-11T00:37:36.633+01:00</atom:updated><title>Notes on the 80/20 rule</title><atom:summary type='text'>If you have any knowledge of business you will most probably be familiar with the 80/20 rule. 80% of your sales derives from 20% of your customers, 80% of a companys profit is created by 20% of its employees, and so on and so forth. This rule of thumb is common business knowledge, and was originally devised by the Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto. It is also known as the Pareto principle. If you</atom:summary><link>http://www.maximise.dk/blog/2005/02/notes-on-8020-rule.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Max)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>